Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

173 Misc. 229

Zatz v. Zatz

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · decided 1940-01-05

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently October 1954

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1940-01-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1Plaintiff may not maintain an action on the separation agreement for support and maintenance which by its terms was required to be and was incorporated in the divorce decree obtained by plaintiff. (See Breiterman v. Breiterman, 239 App. Div. 709, and Landes v. Landes, 172 id. 758.)

¶2Judgment and orders reversed, with ten dollars costs, plaintiff’s motion denied, and defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint granted.

¶3Hammer and Shientag, JJ., concur; Noonan, J., dissents.

¶4Noonan, J. I dissent and vote for affirmance.

/173/misc/229 · .json · Public domain