Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

173 Miss. 829

163 So 442

McGaha v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1935

Mississippi Supreme Court · decided 1935-09-30

Relies on Hughes v. State · Reed v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1935-09-30

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently January 1971

6 state decisions

2019351940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Ethridge, P. J.,

¶1 delivered the opinion of the court.

¶2 The appellant, Oscar McGaha, was convicted of petit larceny and sentenced to serve sixty days in jail upon an affidavit as follows: “Oscar J. McGaha did, on or *831 about the third day of July, 1932, in said district, county and state, wilfully and unlawfully and feloniously steal and carry away one jersey color cow, weight about #500, known as the Louis Suitor cow calf — val. cow at $25.00. Against the peace and dignity,” etc.

¶3 There was nO' demurrer to the affidavit and no motion in arrest of judgment, but an appeal has been taken, and it is contended that the affidavit is fatally defective, in that it fails to charge that the property stolen belonged to anyone, and no attempt is made to allege ownership of the property stolen.

¶4 In Hughes v. State, 74 Miss. 368, 20 So. 838, it was held that the failure to show ownership of the property stolen is a defect of substance and not form, and may be taken advantage of by motion in arrest of judgment as well as by demurrer before trial.

¶5 In Reed v. State, 171 Miss. 65, 156 So. 650, it was held that a fatal defect in an indictment or affidavit may be availed of on appeal for the first time.

¶6 It is necessary for an indictment or affidavit to allege ownership of the property stolen, that being the essence of the offense, and a conviction upon such an affidavit is void, and the defect may be availed of here for the first time.

¶7 The judgment of conviction will therefore be reversed, and the appellant will be held upon his appearance bond to await the action of the next grand jury of the county.

¶8 Reversed and remanded.

/173/miss/829 · .json · Public domain