Clark v. Thias’s Empirical Analysis
1903
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 2 district · 29 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently September 1993 · most notably Carroll v. United Railways Co. (1911), Hill v. First National Bank (1917)
11 federal appellate · 2 district · 29 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Williams v. Edwards · Potter v. McDowell · Banking House of Wilcoxson & Co. v. Rood · Stanton v. Ryan · West v. McMullen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The trustee represents in this proceeding only subsequent creditors; i. e., those who extended credit to the corporation or whose claims were created against it long after the transaction by defendants of which plaintiff complains. As a general rule subsequent creditors cannot attack a transfer unless they can show that the fraudulent intent was intended towards them; or, as is held by the Supreme Court of Alabama: `A subsequent creditor of a corporation cannot complain of a conveyance or transfer of the corporate property unless such conveyance or transfer was made with the intent to hinder, delay, and defraud subsequent creditors, and "that the conveyance or transfer”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hartman v. Lauchli
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.