Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 173 N.C. App. 344 - State v. Alderson

173 N.C. App. 344 - State v. Alderson’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

20 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Alford · 141 N.C. App. 553 - State v. Chavis · 106 N.C. App. 596 - State v. Davis · Nucor Corp. v. General Bearing Corp. · Schultz v. Schultz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) If scientific, technical or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion, or otherwise, if all of the following apply: (1) The testimony is based upon sufficient facts or data. (2) The testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods. (3) The witness has applied the principles and methods reliably to the facts of the case.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.