173 N.C. App. 43 - State v. Bethea’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
June 2017
most recently cited
19 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Ungar v. Sarafite · Lord Electric Co. v. United States · Tennessee v. Street · Sutton v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he court may interrogate witnesses, whether called by itself or by a party.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[a] mistrial is appropriate only when there are such serious improprieties as would make it impossible to attain a fair and impartial verdict under the law. Whether to grant a motion for mistrial is within the trial court's discretion, and its ruling will not be disturbed unless it clearly amounts to a manifest abuse of discretion. The question of misconduct is determined based on the facts and circumstances of each case. The trial judge is in a better position to investigate any allegations of misconduct, question witnesses and observe their demeanor, and make appropriate findings. Accordingly, when a defendant alleges juror misconduct, the trial court is responsible for investigating the matter and making an appropriate inquiry.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Collins“the Confrontation Clause does not act as a bar to testimonial statements admitted for purposes other than the truth of the matter asserted”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.