173 N.C. App. 577 - Morgan v. Steiner’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
25 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on City of Charlotte v. McNeely · State v. Johnson · 127 N.C. App. 1 - ESTATE OF SMITH, BY & THROUGH SMITH v. Underwood · 130 N.C. App. 616 - Heatherly v. Industrial Health Council · 153 N.C. App. 618 - Coffman v. Roberson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“First, if the costs are items provided as costs under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7A-305, then the trial court is required to assess these items as costs. Second, for items not costs under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7A-305, it must be determined if they are "common law costs" under the rationale of [ Department of Transp. v. ] Charlotte Area [ Mfd. Housing, Inc. , 160 N.C. App. 461 , 586 S.E.2d 780 (2003)]. Third, as to "common law costs" we must determine if the trial court abused its discretion in awarding or denying these costs under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 6-20 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“under the rationale of [ Department of Transp. v. ] Charlotte Area [ Mfd. Housing, Inc. , 160 N.C. App. 461 , 586 S.E.2d 780 (2003)]. Third, as to”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[w]here an appeal presents a question of statutory interpretation, this Court conducts a de novo review of the trial court's conclusions of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.