State v. Marshall’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 26 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Holm v. United States · State v. Ramseur · Anderson v. United States · State v. Marshall · State v. Preciose
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`[E]rroneous instructions on material issues are presumed to be reversible error[.]'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“`[C]lear and correct jury instructions are essential for a fair trial' because the jury charge `is a road map to guide the jury, and without an appropriate charge a jury can take a wrong turn in its deliberations.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. RB
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.