173 N.J. Super. 256 - Foley v. Foley’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently May 2012
22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gerhardt v. Continental Insurance · Merenoff v. Merenoff · 84 Wis. 2d 91 - Cieslewicz Ex Rel. Finerty v. Mutual Service Casualty Insurance · Price v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company · 86 Wis. 2d 13 - Bertler v. Employers Insurance of Wausau
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If a claim is made or suit is brought against any insured for damages because of bodily injury or property damage to which this coverage applies, we will: a. pay up to our limit of liability for the damages for which the insured is legally liable, and b. provide a defense at our expense.... * * * * * * * * Personal Liability: We do not cover bodily injury to you or any insured....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The coverage provisions and the exclusions are written one following the other. The exclusions are in bolder type so that one reading the policy will have his attention brought to the terms of the exclusions. The exclusion itself is plain and unambiguous.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.