Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 173 OHIOAPP3D 158 - State v. Kist

State v. Kist’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
1
states following
April 2024
most recently cited

43 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably State v. Braden (2011), State v. Bruce (2018)

43 state decisions

230200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. King · State v. Singer · State v. Pachay · State v. O'Brien · State v. Butcher

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`The standard of review of a speedy trial issue is to count the days of delay chargeable to either side and determine whether the case was tried within the time limits set by R.C. 2945.71 .'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'counsel's control * * * is not unlimited, and there are certain fundamental protections guaranteed an accused which counsel may not waive without his client's concurrence.' ") (citation omitted). {¶ 44} In any event, we need not rehearse further any question of whether Mr. Graham was bound by his lawyer's agreements to the continuances because here we find that the effect of the last continuance in the first case did not also bind him with regard to the second case that later eventuated. Informed by the principle that the speedy trial statute "is * * * mandatory, and must be strictly construed against the state,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he period of any continuance granted on the accused's own motion, and the period of any reasonable continuance granted other than upon the accused's own motion.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.