Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 173 OHIOAPP3D 202 - State v. Winn

State v. Winn’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
May 2023
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently May 2023

23 state decisions

110200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Bradley · State v. Long · State v. Logan · State v. Cook

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To prove the content of a writing, recording, or photograph, the original writing, recording, or photograph is required, except as otherwise provided in these rules or by statute enacted by the General Assembly not in conflict with a rule of the Supreme Court of Ohio.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The original is not required, and other evidence of the contents of a writing, recording, or photograph is admissible if * * * [t]he writing, recording, or photograph is not closely related to a controlling issue.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.