Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 173 Ohio App. 3d 270 - State v. Gragg

173 Ohio App. 3d 270 - State v. Gragg’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
January 2022
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently January 2022

18 state decisions

90200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Jenks · State v. Apanovitch · State v. Moreland · State v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he experience and knowledge of a * * * lay witness can establish his * * * competence to express an opinion on the identity of a controlled substance if a foundation for this testimony is first established.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Meddock · State v. Bowling
  2. “having control over a thing or substance, but may not be inferred solely from mere access to the thing or substance through ownership or occupation of the premises upon which the thing or substance is found.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Cox, Ca2008-03-028 (3-2-2009) · State v. Bowling
  3. “The Draeger test is used to detect the presence of certain chemicals, including anhydrous ammonia. To conduct the test, * * * four steps [are] followed. * * * If the designated air contaminant is present, it reacts with the chemical reagent in the tube, producing a color change. See http://www.afcintl.com/tubemain.htm (last visited Mar. 11, 2004).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Howland, Ca2006-08-035 (2-11-2008)

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.