173 Ohio App. 3d 443 - State v. Asberry’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
34 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably State v. Elliott (2021), State v. Esner, 90740 (12-18-2008) (2008)
34 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · State v. Nero · Woods v. Telb · United States v. Holman · 38 Ohio App. 3d 160 - State v. Darmour
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Substantial compliance means that under the totality of the circumstances the defendant subjectively understands the implications of his plea and the rights he is waiving.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[d]termining that the defendant is making the plea voluntarily, with understanding of the nature of the charges and of the maximum penalty involved ***.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“with the rule. Id., citing State v. Asberry , 173 Ohio App.3d 443 , 2007-Ohio-5436 ; State v. Moviel , Cuyahoga App. No. 86244, 2006-Ohio-697 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.