Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 173 Okla. 64 - Stocker v. Stocker

Stocker v. Stocker’s Empirical Analysis

1935

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
April 1986
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently April 1986

15 state decisions

60193519401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Drumm-Flato Commission Co. v. Edmisson · Javine v. Javine · Bussey v. Bussey · Doggett v. Doggett · Tahona Smokeless Coal Co. v. State Industrial Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘Extreme cruelty’, as between husband and wife, exists when the conduct of the husband or wife is such that the life or health of the other may be endangered, or when such conduct unjustifiably wounds the mental feelings or so destroys the peace of mind as seriously to impair the health or endanger the life of the other, or is such as utterly destroys the legitimate objectives and aims of matrimony.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.