Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 173 Or. 158 - French v. Christner

French v. Christner’s Empirical Analysis

1944

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
February 1980
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently February 1980

5 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

10019441950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Silva v. Waldie · Murphy v. Hawthorne · Devoto v. United Auto Transportation Co. · Rozycki v. Yantic Grain & Products Co. · Rasmussen v. George Benz & Sons

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is undoubtedly the law that a driver of a motor vehicle whose vision is obscured by fog or other weather conditions, dust or smoke, must exercise care commensurate with the danger involved. It is common knowledge that it is extremely dangerous to drive through smoke when the vision is almost completely obscured as in the instant case. * * *” French v. Christner et al., 173 Or. 158 , 135 P. 2d 464 , 143 P. 2d 674 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““* '* * Any experienced driver knows that the utmost care must be exercised under such circumstances but that travel can be maintained with comparative safety when such care is exercised by those using the highway. Undoubtedly, the same principles of law apply to smoke.” French v. Christner et al., supra.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““In determining the question of contributory negligence we must measure the conduct of the plaintiff, not in the light of subsequent events, but by the standard of care which would have been exercised by an ordinarily prudent and careful person under the conditions then appearing to exist.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.