Cross v. Campbell’s Empirical Analysis
1944
Citation profile
2 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 1990
2 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lee Tung v. Burkhart · Weinstein v. Wheeler · Blake-McFall Co. v. Wilson · Sullivan v. Oregon Railway & Navigation Co. · Stotts v. Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“* * * [s]uch waiver may be proved by parol and by circumstantial evidence, as well as by direct testimony.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““In Wheeler v. McFerron, 33 Or. 22 , 52 P. 993 , we recognized that a structure as important as a warehouse ‘may be personal property, for which an action of replevin * * * will lie.’ See to like effect 22 Am. Jur., Fixtures, §§ 64 and 65. The reason for the decision just cited was the fact that the parties had not intended the building to become part of the land. Today, the intention of the parties is of pre-eminent importance. Blake-McFall Co. v. Wilson, 98 Or. 626 , 193 P. 902 , 14 A.L.R. 1275 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a party * * * may waive performance of any of its provisions if he so chooses.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.