Chandler v. State, Office of Ins. Com'r’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 1 Cal. 3d 214 - Morrison v. State Board of Education · 122 Wash. 2d 397 - Tapper v. Employment Security Department · 105 Wash. 2d 381 - Tank v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. · In re Disbarment of Pincham · 117 Wash. 2d 720 - Haley v. Medical Disciplinary Board
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The reviewing officer shall exercise all the decision-making power that the reviewing officer would have had to decide and enter the final order had the reviewing officer presided over the hearing, except to the extent that the issues subject to review are limited by a provision of law or by the reviewing officer upon notice to all the parties. In reviewing findings of fact by presiding officers, the reviewing officers shall give due regard to the presiding officer's opportunity to observe the witnesses.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[w]e do not need to decide whether the review judge properly adopted a heightened standard of care because substantial evidence supports her decision under the statutory duty of care”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Reviewing courts may grant relief only if the party challenging the agency order shows that the order is invalid for one of the reasons set forth in RCW 34.05.570(3).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Association v. City
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.