Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

173 So. 2d 697

Overholser Construction Co. v. Porter

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 21, 1964

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1964-10-21

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently March 1997

4 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1964-10-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ON PETITION FOR REHEARING of Case No. 32564.

PER CURIAM.

¶2By petition for rehearing it is suggested that our judgment is unclear regarding the liability of Venning and Ward Masonry.

¶3The deputy commissioner apportioned liability equally between Venning and Ward and Overholser Construction Company. For reasons stated in our opinion, we have held Overholser not liable for the portion of the responsibility assigned to it. Hence, Venning and Ward remains responsible for one-half of the total liability and therefore one-half of the compensation benefits of all description otherwise due the respondent Porter. When addressed to our opinion thus clarified, the petition for re-hearing is denied.

¶4It is so ordered.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, TFIORNAL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.
/173/so2d/697 · .json · Public domain