Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

173 So. 2d 708

Bailey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1965-04-08

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1965-04-08

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently February 2005

6 state decisions

2019651970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed.

¶2While the appellant in his brief makes certain statements of fact which might, had they been properly alleged in a pleading and established in the record, have raised a justiciable issue, such facts are not so alleged or proved. Hence, since a brief is in no legal sense a pleading, it would be highly improper for us to consider such an issue based solely upon statements and arguments contained in the brief.

WIGGINTON, Acting Chief Judge, CARROLL, DONALD K., and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
/173/so2d/708 · .json · Public domain