D.D.P. v. D.M.B.’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 897 So. 2d 379 - Kb v. Cleburne County Dept. of Human Res. · 358 So. 2d 451 - Crews v. HOUSTON CTY. DEPT. OF PENSIONS & SEC. · 990 So. 2d 414 - Vw v. Gw · 90 So. 3d 762 - M.G. v. J.T. · R.C. v. L.C.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"[u]nder the particular circumstances of this case, in which the dependency of the child was initially determined in April 2010 and the juvenile court expressly declined to consider the issue of dependency in the January 2013 hearing by limiting the scope of that hearing solely to dispositional matters , we must conclude that the mother's constitutional rights to due process were violated."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. D.H. v. B.M.“'[I]n order to make a disposition of a child in the context of a dependency proceeding, the child must in fact be dependent at the time of that disposition .'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“' M.G. v. J.T. , 90 So.3d 762 , 764 (Ala. Civ. App. 2012) (quoting earlier cases), and, concomitantly, '”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. K.R. v. Z.B.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.