173 So. 3d 1192 - Oddo v. Asbestos Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

7 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “|SA witness who is qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education may testify in the form of an opinion or otherwise if: • 1. The expert/s scientific, technical, or other specialized ■ knowledge will help the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue; 2. The testimony is based on sufficient facts or data; 3. The testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods; and 4. The expert has reliably applied the principles and methods to the facts of the case.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 197 So. 3d 791 - Kanda Construction, LLC v. Gebre

2. “In certain cases, a preponderance of the evidence cannot be determined fairly from a cold record, such as when there is substantial testimonial conflict that can only be resolved depending upon the fact-finder’s.view of the witnesses’ credibility. In such cases the appellate court may conclude that the appropriate remedy is to remand for a new trial,”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 197 So. 3d 366 - Chatman v. Southern University at New Orleans

3. “If the trial court or jury findings are reasonable in light of the record reviewed in its entirety, the court of appeal may not reverse...”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Craft v. Ports Am. Gulfport, Inc.