173 So. 3d 1222 - State v. Hayes’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · North Carolina v. Alford · 338 So. 2d 584 - State v. Crosby · 475 So. 2d 336 - State v. Counterman · State Ex Rel. Roland v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In this case, the convictions resulted from guilty, pleas so the facts surrounding the offenses were gleaned from the bill .of information. Here, the record reflects that, on or about February 17, 2012, defendant committed a theft of tools, valued at over $1,500, from Wayne McClure, in violation of La. R.S. 14:67. As to count two, the record reflects that, on or about February 19, 2012, defendant committed an unauthorized use of a 1996. Ford F-150 belonging to Kenneth Morvant, in violation of La. R.S. 14:68.4. As to count three, the record reflects that, on or about February 17, 2012," defendant,took a 2000 Jeep.Grand Cherokee from Javante Barnes by use of force or-intimidation, in violation of La. R.S. 14:64.2. As to count four, the record reflects that, .on or about February 17, 2012, defendant [ ^committed an unauthorized use of a 2003 Ford Crown Victoria, belonging to Michael Peters, in .violation of La. R.S. 14:68.2.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[T]he due process clause imposes no constitutional duty on state trial judges to ascertain a factual basis prior to accepting a guilty plea....Louisiana law, unlike [federal law] has no statutory provision requiring accompaniment of a guilty plea by the recitation of a factual basis.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bowman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.