Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 173 SW2D 199 - Thomas v. Billingsley

Thomas v. Billingsley’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
March 1998
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently March 1998

15 state decisions

50194319501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kaiser v. Newsom

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) Not less than twelve jurors can render and return a verdict in a felony case. It must be concurred in by each juror and signed by the foreman. Except as provided in Subsection (b) of this section, however, when pending the trial of any felony case, one juror may die or be disabled from sitting at any time before the charge of the court is read to the jury, the remainder of the jury shall have the power to render the verdict; but when the verdict shall be rendered by less than the whole number, it shall be signed by every member of the jury concurring in it.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““The point raised is that, the trial of the case had not begun when the juror was excused, hence the ‘trial’ was not ‘pending,’ so as to give rise to the power of the court in compelling defendant to proceed with the trial before eleven jurors. We think the ‘trial was pending’ when the parties announced ready and the jury was selected and sworn to try the. cause.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.