Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

173 S.W.3d 657

State v. Barrett

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 18, 2005

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2005-10-18

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 2008

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2005-10-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2 Timothy Barrett (Barrett) appeals the trial court’s judgment, which was entered after a jury found him guilty of Stealing a Controlled Substance. The trial court sentenced Barrett to six years’ imprisonment. There was sufficient evidence for a jury to find, beyond a reasonable doubt, that Barrett stole morphine from his place of employment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the Record on Appeal, and we find no error of law in this case. Thus, no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

/173/sw3d/657 · .json · Public domain