Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

173 S.W.3d 691

State v. Arnold

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 18, 2005

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2005-10-18

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 2007

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2005-10-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2 Donald J. Arnold (hereinafter, “Defendant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of first degree assault, Section 565.050 RSMo (2000), and armed criminal action, Section 571.015 RSMo (2000). Defendant was sentenced as a prior offender to concurrent terms of thirty years imprisonment. Defendant raises one point on appeal, claiming the trial court erred in failing to allow Defendant to question the victim regarding a pending DWI charge as this would have exposed the victim’s bias.

¶3 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

¶4 The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

/173/sw3d/691 · .json · Public domain