Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 173 U.S. 684 - Lake Shore Ry Co v. Smith

Lake Shore Ry Co v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

173 U.S. 684 · 1899

Citation profile

254
cited by 254 later decisions
31
cited 31 times by the Supreme Court
33
states following
May 1984
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 25 district · 96 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 254 later decisions (31 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1984 · most notably Mondou v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad (1912), Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad (1916)

7 federal appellate · 25 district · 96 state decisions — followed in 33 states

10001899190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Smyth v. Ames · Munn v. Illinois · Reagan v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. · Chicago Ry Co v. Wellman · Cherokee Nation v. Southern Kan Ry Co

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 254 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““What the company may choose voluntarily to do furnishes no criterion for the measurement of the power of the Legislature. Persons may voluntarily contract to do what no Legislature would' have the right to compel them to do. Nor does it furnish a standard by which to measure the reasonableness of the matter exacted by the Legislature.” Lake Shore & M. S. Railway v. Smith, 173 U. S. 684 , 697, 19 Sup. Ct. 565 , 43 L. Ed. 858 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.