Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 173 Vt. 132 - State v. Hendricks

State v. Hendricks’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably State v. Hinchliffe (2009), State v. Bolaski (2014)

26 state decisions

100200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Huddleston v. United States · State v. Catsam · State v. Delisle · State v. Streich · State v. Clark

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This ease presents exactly the circumstances to which the reasoning of Sanders applies. The jury was presented with a single act of domestic violence. Defendant asserted that his actions during the incident were in self-defense, and that injuries to the victim occurred either in defending himself or as a result of the victim’s previous accidental fall.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “before entry of the plea, may accept or reject the agreement, or defer its decision as to acceptance or rejection until there has been an opportunity to consider the presentence report.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “rejected the argument that acceptance of the plea agreement must be presumed unless the court explicitly rejects the agreement or defers its decision.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.