State v. Garbutt’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
28 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1358 (§ 288 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Berkemer v. McCarty · Stansbury v. California · Paul v. United States · State v. Willis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an objective inquiry into the totality of the circumstances to determine if a reasonable person would believe he or she were free to leave or to refuse to answer police questioning.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Oney“although longer than the average roadside stop[,] was ... necessary”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Suspects not in custody are not entitled to Miranda warnings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Oney
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.