State v. Chapman’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
34
cited by 34 later decisions
1
states following
October 2015
most recently cited
34 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Florida v. Royer · Cady v. Dombrowski · Posr v. Doherty · State v. Badger
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[T]he amount of force used by police, the need for such force, and the extent to which the individual’s freedom of movement was restrained, . . . and in particular such factors as the number of agents involved, . . . whether the target of the stop was suspected of being armed, . . . the duration of the stop, . . . and the physical treatment of the suspect . . . including whether or not handcuffs were used.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[a] brief detention, its scope reasonably related to the justification for the stops and inquiry, is permitted in order to investigate the circumstances that provoke suspicion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ford“An investigative detention employs `the least intrusive means reasonably available to verify or dispel the officer's suspicion in a short period of time.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Cunningham
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.