Dana v. Piper’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
July 2020
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Hearn v. Rhay · Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Inc. v. Home Indemnity Co. · 75 Wash. 2d 1 - Dike v. Dike · 114 Wash. 2d 198 - Pappas v. Holloway · United States v. De La Jara
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) [Assertion of the privilege was the result of some affirmative act, such as filing suit, by the asserting party; (2) through this affirmative act, the asserting party put the protected information at issue by making it relevant to the case; and (3) application of the privilege would have denied the opposing party access to information vital to his defense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“An attorney or counselor shall not, without the consent of his or her client, be examined as to any communication made by the client to him or her, or his or her advice given thereon in the course of professional employment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.