State v. Hubanks’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
2 district · 47 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 51 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2019 · most notably 190 Wis. 2d 31 - State v. Flynn (1994), 199 Wis. 2d 48 - Ritt v. Dental Care Associates, S.C. (1995)
2 district · 47 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Wade · Griffin v. California · Pennsylvania v. Muniz · United States v. Guest · Doe v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'was not intended to vest this court with power of discretionary reversal to enable a defendant to present an alternative defense' that may have not been advanced by trial counsel at the first trial whose representation is alleged to be ineffective because of that failure.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“Likewise, in this case, the court-ordered voice sample was to be used only for the purposes of voice identification. Hubanks was not asked to reveal his thoughts or speak his guilt. Rather, the words he was to speak had been chosen for him and did not compel him to reveal the contents of his mind.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“There are two components to a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel: a demonstration that counsel's performance was deficient, and a demonstration that such deficient performance prejudiced the defendant. The defendant has the burden of proof on both components.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.