Strait v. Crary’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 137 Wis. 2d 109 - Gonzalez Ex Rel. Bichler v. City of Franklin · 153 Wis. 2d 101 - Raby v. Moe · 126 Wis. 2d 492 - Liles v. Employers Mutual Insurance · Shaw v. Wuttke · 70 Wis. 2d 1022 - Hoeft v. Friedel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“NEGLIGENCE OF CHILDREN As a child, (-) was required to use the degree of care which is ordinarily exercised by a child of the same age, intelligence, discretion, knowledge, and experience under the same or similar circumstances. In determining whether (child) exercised this degree of care, you should consider the child's instincts and impulses with respect to dangerous acts, since a child may not have the prudence, discretion, or thoughtfulness of an adult.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“COMPARATIVE NEGLIGENCE: ADULT AND CHILD If you are to answer question-, you should consider that -was an adult and-was a child and consider and weigh the credible evidence bearing on the inquiries presented, in the light of the difference in the rules which you were previously instructed to apply in determining whether the conduct of the parties was negligent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“instruct the jury with due regard to the facts of the case, and thus '[i]t is error for the trial court to refuse to instruct on an issue which is raised by the evidence.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.