State v. Holtz’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
May 2011
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 153 Wis. 2d 493 - State v. Poellinger · 76 Wis. 2d 30 - Wagner v. State · 44 Wis. 2d 68 - State v. Dolan · 83 Wis. 2d 440 - Balistreri v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, an appellate court may not substitute its judgment for that of the trier of fact unless the evidence, viewed most favorably to the state and the conviction, is so lacking in probative value and force that no trier of fact, acting reasonably, could have found guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.