State v. Schuman’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 90 Wis. 2d 97 - Charolais Breeding Ranches, Ltd. v. FPC Securities Corp. · 137 Wis. 2d 31 - State v. Hoa Duc Pham · 119 Wis. 2d 871 - In Interest of PAK · 160 Wis. 2d 353 - Brandt v. Labor & Industry Review Commission · 56 Wis. 2d 286 - State Ex Rel. Pedersen v. Blessinger
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[0]ur supreme court stated in [State ex rel. Pedersen v. Blessinger, 56 Wis. 2d 286, 290 , 201 N.W.2d 778, 781 (1972)], "We do have in sec. 973.07, Stats., a six months' limitation on the enforcement method of collection of a fine by imprisonment, supposedly on the ground of public policy that if six months' incarceration will not induce payment, a longer period [of time] will be fruitless." After a defendant has served six months in jail for failure to pay a fine, the state must use other methods, such as civil collection, to collect the fine.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.