People v. Hamel’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
September 2008
most recently cited
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Inasmuch as defendant sought to impeach the complainant’s credibility ..., without an adequate factual basis for believing that the prior complaint was false ..., we see no abuse of [trial court’s] discretion in denying defendant’s motion to permit cross-examination of the complainant about a prior incident of attempted rape.”); People v. Lippert, 138 A.D.2d 770, 771 , 525 N.Y.S.2d 390, 391 (App.Div.3d Dept. 1988) (no abuse of discretion”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cummings v. Burge
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.