State v. McPhaul’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Celaya · State v. Schroeder · State v. Dugan · 107 Wash. 2d 59 - State v. Pacheco · State v. Hurley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“nothing inconsistent, illogical or improper about a defendant saying, 'I was not the person who committed the robbery, but even if you do not believe me, the evidence shows that whoever did commit it was not armed' "). ¶ 15 The State also argues we should treat self-defense like the entrapment affirmative defense, which precludes simultaneous assertion of a misidentification defense. See A.R.S. § 13-206(A) ("To claim entrapment, the person must admit by the person's testimony or other evidence the substantial elements of the offense charged.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.