Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 174 Ark. 715 - Smith v. Drake

Smith v. Drake’s Empirical Analysis

1927

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
September 1995
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently September 1995

12 state decisions

4019271930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Purnell v. Nichol · Jett v. Shinn · Atkinson v. Heer & Co. · Tate v. Biggs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A return on a writ of execution is the short official statement of the officer, indorsed thereon or attached thereto, of what he has done in obedience to the mandate of the writ, or of the reason why he had done nothing. It consists of the two acts of writing out the statement on the writ or on an attached paper, and the filing. The mere writing out of the statement is not sufficient without filing it, and, vice versa, the mere filing of the writ with no statement is not a return. 23 C.J. 791.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.