Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 174 BR 114 - In Re Symes

In Re Symes’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
February 2016
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently February 2016 · most notably Hessinger & Associates v. U.S. Trustee (1997), In Re Toms (1999)

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

150199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 103 · 11 U.S.C. § 329 · 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 11 U.S.C. § 727

Relies on Kelly v. Robinson · New Jersey Department of Corrections v. Nash · Avellino & Bienes v. M. Frenville Co. · M. Frenville Co. v. Avellino & Bienes · Yermakov v. Fitzsimmons

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the special attorney-client relationship,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.