Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 174 BR 215 - In Re Wilson

In Re Wilson’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
November 2002
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 11 U.S.C. § 506 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157

Relies on United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc. · Dewsnup v. Timm · Nobelman v. American Savings Bank · Rake v. Wade · Grubbs v. Houston First American Savings Ass'n

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “With respect to secured claims provided for by the plan, the holder of the claim must have accepted the plan, or the debtor must either distribute under the plan the value, as of the effective date of the plan, to the holder of the claim, property of a value that is not less than the allowed amount of the secured claim, as determined under proposed 11 U.S.C. 506(a), or the debtor must surrender the property securing the claim to the holder of the claim.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “An allowed claim of a creditor secured by a lien on property in which the estate has an interest ... is a secured claim to the extent of the value of such creditor’s interest in the estate's interest in such property ... and is an unsecured claim to the extent that the value of such creditor's interest ... is less than the amount of such allowed claim.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.