Auerbach v. Healy’s Empirical Analysis
1916
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 40 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably 31 Cal. 2d 202 - Johndrow v. Thomas (1947), Pascoe v. Morrison (1933)
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 40 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ward v. Waterman · Newton v. Hull · Peasley v. Mcfadden · Seegelken v. Corey · Wright v. Shafter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The rules of pleading in actions for the reformation of contracts are well established and should be familiar. The complaint should allege `what the real agreement was, what the agreement as reduced to writing was, and where the writing fails to embody the real agreement.' 34 Cyc. 972”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.