Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 174 CALAPP2D 30 - People v. Cox

People v. Cox’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
December 1973
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on People v. Lindsey · 79 Cal. App. 2d 94 - People v. Henderson · 76 Cal. App. 2d 330 - People v. Hill · People v. Soldavini · 48 Cal. 2d 600 - People v. Dement

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Mere conversations between the jurors and officers of the court do not per se amount to misconduct. Such conduct, although often unfortunate, does not in every case militate to the determination that a mistrial must be declared. The mere showing of such a communication does not raise a presumption that the jury was improperly influenced. Prejudice must be shown. (Citations.) ” (See People v. Cox, 174 Cal.App.2d 30, 37-38 [ 344 P.2d 399 ].)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.