Saake v. Lederer’s Empirical Analysis
174 F. 135 · 1909
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently December 1943
1 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Henry Wheaton v. Richard Peters · Davis v. Patrick · Banks v. Manchester · Belford Clarke Co v. Scribner · Thompson v. Hubbard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““When suit for infringement is brought, the librarian’s certificate does not per se establish the copyright; but the burden rests on the plaintiff to show compliance with statutory requirements as conditions precedent.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.