Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

174 F. 151

Docket No. 40.

Browning v. Funke

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided November 17, 1909.)

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1909-11-17

<p>1. Patents (§ 328*) — Infringement-—Magazine Firearm.</p> <p>The Browning patent, No. 580.925, for a magazine firearm, claim 14, if conceded invention and validity, held not infringed.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For other eases, see Patents, Dec. Dig. § 328.*]</p> <p>2. Patents (§ 328*) — Intention.</p> <p>The Browning patent, No. 730,870, for a magazine firearm, claims 37, 38, and 39, are void for lack of invention.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — Por other cases,'see Patents, Dee. Dig. § 32S.*]</p>

2 counsel of record

Relies on Browning v. Funke

Affirmed · Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1909-11-17

¶11. Patents (§ 328*) — Infringement-—Magazine Firearm.

¶2The Browning patent, No. 580.925, for a magazine firearm, claim 14, if conceded invention and validity, held not infringed.

¶3[Ed. Note. — For other eases, see Patents, Dec. Dig. § 328.*]

¶4*1522. Patents 328*) — Intention.

¶5The Browning patent, No. 730,870, for a magazine firearm, claims 37, 38, and 39, are void for lack of invention.

¶6[Ed. Note. — Por other cases,'see Patents, Dee. Dig. § 32S.*]

¶7Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

¶8Bill by John M. Browning and the Colt’s Patent Firearms Manufacturing Company against .Albert H. Funke to enjoin infringement of letters patent. Decree for defendants dismissing the bill (164 Fed. 197), and complainants appeal.

¶9Affirmed.

¶10Frederick P. Fish, and W. A. Redding, for appellants.

¶11Grafton R. McGill (J. Nota McGill and Frederic D. McKenney, of counsel), for appellee.

¶12. Before LACOMBE, COXE, and WARD, Circuit Judges.

¶14PER CURIAM.

¶15Decree affirmed, with costs, on opinion of Circuit Court.

/174/f1d/151 · .json · Public domain