Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 174 F.1d 312 - Connolly v. Bouck

Connolly v. Bouck’s Empirical Analysis

174 F. 312 · 1909

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
February 1958
most recently cited

7 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 1958

7 federal appellate ·

40190919101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Silliman v. United States · French v. Shoemaker · New v. . Nicoll · Duryea v. Burt · Gisborn v. Charter Oak Life Ins Co of Hartford

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A contract made under duress is not void, but voidable only, and cannot be avoided by a party who, after its execution, has ratified it by accepting its benefits.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.