Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 174 F.1d 330 - In re Stavrahn

In re Stavrahn’s Empirical Analysis

174 F. 330 · 1909

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
September 1972
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 9 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 1972 · most notably Maggio v. Zeitz (1948), Cooper v. Dasher (1933)

14 federal appellate · 9 district ·

10019091910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Samel v. Dodd · First Nat. Bank v. Cole · First Nat. Bank of Biddeford v. Cole

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Of course, he should have notice of the motion to punish him for such disobedience, and have his day in court, when he may present what he may hare to urge against such motion and an opportunity to be heard.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.