Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 174 F.1d 834 - In re Halladjian

In re Halladjian’s Empirical Analysis

174 F. 834 · 1909

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
October 2015
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 8 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2015

5 federal appellate · 8 district · 1 state decisions

70190919101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fong Yue Ting v. United States · Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Taggart · In re Camille · In re Yamashita · In re Saito

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to aliens [being free white persons, and to aliens] of African nativity and persons of African descent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.