In re Elletson Co.’s Empirical Analysis
174 F. 859 · 1909
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 7 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 1944
8 federal appellate · 7 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Frank Thompson v. Henry Fairbanks · Whitney v. Wenman · White v. Schloerb · Humphrey v. Tatman · Hicks v. Knost
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In the, Bartles Case the trust deed was only assailed as being fraudulent on its face. Here the trust deed is not only assailed for this reason, but also because it is fraudulent in fact, and, as I have indicated, I think the facts disclosed clearly show it to be so, made as it was to hinder and delay creditors from interfering with this property, while the company carried on business with it for years.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Swager v. Smith
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.