Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

174 F.2d 126

Docket No. 10784.

In re Butler

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided April 13, 1949.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1949-04-13

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 1971

1 district ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1949-04-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1August Butler (in pro. per.) Marquette, Mich., for self.

¶2Stephen J. Roth, Perry A. Maynard, Lansing, Mich., for appellee.

¶3Before ALLEN, MARTIN, and McAL-LISTER, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5The above cause having come on to be heard upon the file and records, and the briefs of August Butler and the Attorney General of the State of Michigan, and the Court being duly advised; now, therefore, it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the district court denying appellant’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus be and is hereby affirmed upon the opinion ■of the district court in the said cause.

/174/f2d/126 · .json · Public domain