Burrows v. Forrestal

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued March 17, 1949.

Decided March 28, 1949.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1949-03-28

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 1957

2 federal appellate ·

3 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1949-03-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Messrs. Samuel Gordon and Charles Forrest McKay, Jr., both of Washington, D. C. , for appellant.

¶2Mr. L. Clark Ewing, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. George Morris Fay, U. S. Atty., and John D. Lane, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellees Forrestal, Royall, and Green.

¶3Mr. Leslie C. Garnett, of Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Samuel F. Beach, of Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellees Wolfgang and Margarethe.

¶4Before EDGERTON, CLARK and PROCTOR, Circuit Judges.

¶5PER CURIAM.

¶6We find no error in the record. , The judgment of the District Court is therefore affirmed.

Download

Copy

Embed on your site

Hover to preview · click to copy the code

Search Wikipedia →

Court

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Panel

Henry White Edgerton
Chief Judge
Bennett Champ Clark
Circuit Judge
James McPherson Proctor
Circuit Judge
PER CURIAM.
By the court
Read opinion →

Counsel

Messrs. Samuel Gordon and Charles Forrest McKay, Jr., both of Washington, D. C. , for appellant.

Mr. L. Clark Ewing, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. George Morris Fay, U. S. Atty., and John D. Lane, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellees Forrestal, Royall, and Green.

Mr. Leslie C. Garnett, of Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Samuel F. Beach, of Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellees Wolfgang and Margarethe.