Hudson v. Hiatt

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided May 9, 1949.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1949-05-09

2 counsel of record

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1 (Bankruptcy Judgeship Act of 1992)

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1949-05-09

¶1William V. Hudson, of Atlanta, Ga., in pro. per., for appellant.

¶2J. Ellis Mundy, U. S. Atty., and Harvey H. Tisinger, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.

¶3Before HOLMES, McCORD, and WALLER, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5The judgment of the lower Court must be affirmed because of the failure of the petitioner to comply with Sec. 2255, Title 28 U.S.C.A.1 Moreover, we find no reversible error in the case otherwise.

¶6Judgment is affirmed.