Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 174 F.2d 448 - Mosca v. United States

Mosca v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

174 F.2d 448 · 1949

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
October 1994
most recently cited

42 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1994 · most notably United States v. Calderon (1954), Cephus v. United States (1963)

42 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

350194919501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 8

Relies on United States v. Goldstein · Ziegler v. United States · Marron v. United States · Didenti v. United States · Elder v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““1. Co'unsel for the appellant shall file with the clerk of this court 20 copies of a printed brief * * * . This brief shall contain * * * “(d) In all cases save those of admiralty, a specification of errors relied upon which shall be numbered and shall set out separately and particularly each error intended to be urged. When the error alleged is to the admission or rejection of evidence the specification shall quote the grounds urged at the trial for the objection and the full substance of the evidence admitted or rejected, and refer to the page number in the printed or typewritten transcript where the same may be found. * * * ””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.